Tourism Marketing Without Social Media: Answers to the Questions We Keep Hearing
These are the questions we hear most often from people who market a destination for a living. Short, direct answers first, with a link to the fuller piece if you want the whole argument.
Why are so many tourism boards burning out on social media?
Because the format demands constant output just to matter at all. Every post has a short shelf life before the algorithm buries it, so the work never actually accumulates: next month starts back at zero, no matter how good last month's content was.
What are the alternatives to social media for destination marketing?
A channel that keeps running once it is built, instead of a feed that needs new content every few days. That can mean a 24/7 stream of real footage on the web, or the same footage looping on a screen your visitors are already standing in front of: a visitor centre, a ferry terminal, a hotel lobby.
How do we measure success beyond likes and followers?
By measuring time instead of taps. A like costs a quarter of a second and proves almost nothing. Someone leaving a channel running for an hour while they work is a far more honest sign that a destination has actually reached them.
How can we market a destination without a constant content calendar?
By filming a journey properly once and letting it keep running, instead of treating marketing as something that has to be fed every day just to stay alive. The cost is front-loaded into the filming. After that, there is nothing left to keep feeding.
What can we do with old destination footage that's just sitting there?
Turn it into a channel. A documentary from a past campaign, unused drone survey footage, the full take behind a thirty-second ad: all of it can run as a 24/7 stream at close to no extra cost, because the expensive part, the filming, already happened.
How does a destination get discovered without paid advertising?
Through the people who watch, not the platforms a destination pays. A code on the footage leads to whatever the destination actually wants, a booking page, an enquiry form, and when someone else builds a channel of their own around footage they loved, that code travels with it, into an audience the destination never had to build.
Where do we start?
Tell us about the destination, and what footage, if any, already exists. From there we can work out whether it is a channel worth filming, an archive worth repurposing, or a screen already standing idle somewhere worth using properly.
More from the Journal
- What the railways do not tell you about your Interrail pass
- Missed your connection? There is a rule almost nobody mentions
- The Cheapest Channel You'll Ever Launch Is the One You've Already Filmed
- The Most Underused Screen in Travel Is the One Everyone Is Already Staring At
- Nobody Leans Back for a Reel
- What If Your Destination's Marketing Didn't Need Feeding Every Day?
- The Problem With Measuring a Destination in Likes
- Why Tourism Boards Are Quietly Burning Out on Social Media
- Italy's Scenic Trains Deserve the Slow Treatment
- Iceland's Ring Road, at a Slower Pace
- The Best Slow-TV Train Journeys in the World
- What a Slow-Travel Channel Actually Looks Like: A Note for Tourism Boards
- How to Watch Slow Travel TV on the Big Screen (Right Now)
- Digital Detox Television: Why "Boring" TV Is Having a Moment
- Train Otaku: Inside Japan's Culture of Watching the Rails
- The Birthplace of Slow TV: How Norway Started It All
- What slow travel really means
- Why our journeys run an hour or more
- The €49 Deutschlandticket: easy to start, hard to stop